- PLoS One to. 2022; 17(6): e0270103. »
- Decision Page 0
2022; 17 (6) : e0270103. Typed on the web 2022 Jun 29. doi: /log.pone.0270103.r001 Johnson Chun-Sing Cheung, Part Editor Copyright © 2022 Johnson Chun-Sing Cheung
This can be an open accessibility article delivered underneath the terms of brand new Innovative Commons Attribution Licenses, which it allows unrestricted explore, distribution, and breeding in every average, considering the initial blogger and you may source are credited.
If you like making change to your financial revelation, please are their updated statement on your own cover letter
Immediately following consideration, we think it possess merit but does not completely meet PLOS A person’s guide conditions as it already really stands. Hence, we invite that complete a revised sorts of new manuscript one to contact the new situations increased from inside the opinion techniques.
Please fill in your own changed manuscript by . If you will you want more time than that it to accomplish your posts, please react to it content or get in touch with the fresh record place of work during the Before you go to submit your change, log in to and choose the brand new ‘Submissions Looking for Revision’ folder in order to to acquire their manuscript file.
An excellent rebuttal page one reacts every single part elevated by the informative publisher and reviewer(s). You should upload which page since a different file labeled ‘Response so you’re able to Reviewers’.
Reasonable-upwards content of the manuscript you to definitely features change made to new brand spanking new adaptation. You ought to publish this since an alternative file labeled ‘Revised Manuscript with Track Changes’.
An enthusiastic unmarked kind of their revised paper versus tracked alter. You will want to publish which since another document branded ‘Manuscript’.
If the appropriate, it is recommended that your put your laboratory standards in to promote the fresh reproducibility of one’s efficiency. assigns your own process its identifier (DOI) so it can be cited on their own afterwards. Getting directions see: In addition, PLOS That has the benefit of a choice for publishing fellow-assessed Research Protocol content, which explain standards hosted toward . Find out more information about discussing protocols at
1. Please make sure your manuscript meets PLOS An individual’s layout requirements, and additionally those to have document naming. The newest PLOS You to design templates is available in the
“It enterprise is actually supported by a sufferers out of Crime Operate (VOCA) government citation-thanks to offer granted to your workplace of one’s Tx Governor (OOG) Child Sex Trafficking Class and you can Traffick911. Brand new mentor of this process – Traffick911 – enjoys helped towards research build and you can study range package revealed inside method. Traffick911 administrators has accepted the brand new process described herein. The new feedback, results, findings, and you can recommendations indicated contained in this book are the ones of your writer(s) and don’t necessarily reflect new views of your VOCA, OOG, otherwise Traffick911.
Excite county exactly what role the new funders took regarding the analysis. When your funders had no part, please county: “”New funders didn’t come with role into the investigation build, study collection and you may investigation, decision to post, otherwise preparing of one’s manuscript.””
Excite become it revised Part of Funder declaration in your safety letter; we’re going to alter the online submitting mode in your stead.
step three. Your own ethics statement would be to simply are available in the ways element of the manuscript. In case the stability statement is created in any point in addition to the Procedures, delight remove they out-of some other part.
Reviewer #1: It process means a meaningful comparison out-of an anti-sex trafficking system, additionally the ensuing analyses will almost certainly end up being an important addition toward field
p2: The latest fact to have detta kontaktformulГ¤r three hundred,000 on-chance young people shall be clarified, since the bounds wherein youngsters are considered at stake for the that it solution aren’t the same as the men and women used later within the the methods to determine and that individuals are “on the line” and you may eligible for the applying. What should be modified in these introductory paragraphs plus in the ways making it obvious toward reader this difference can be obtained.